Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Dieting discipline is actually counted by Diet Scale of Dining Attitudes Shot (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of sixteen comments scored into the a great 6-area level (never https://kissbrides.com/es/por/mujeres-solteras-altas/ = 0/usually = 5), which have highest score proving a sophisticated out-of restrained dining. To your Eat psychometrical services find Garner ainsi que al. (1982). The brand new feel coefficient for both samples, the North american country and you will German of them, try of the same worthy of, an alpha out-of 0.76.
Weightloss restraint
Ineffectiveness level. The new negative apply at factor is projected from Ineffectiveness Size out of this new Dining Problems Catalog (EDI) (Garner ainsi que al., 1983), which has shown an excellent convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) out-of R = 0.70 (p
Scientific professionals got the extra weight and top tips
Body mass index (BMI). Body mass index try determined because the weight inside kilograms separated because of the height when you look at the rectangular m (Bmi = kg/m2).
Ahead of data collection, a great airplane pilot examination of the latest Silhouettes Measure (Figure step one), used on a sample composed of 20 North american country students, was utilized to evaluate the newest appropriateness of your own numbers so you can represent body sizes, so you can validate a beneficial acceptation regarding a not known set of silhouettes and you will a very clear knowledge of the instructions (brand new Italian language classification currently measured having investigation in this admiration). The outcomes presented brand new Outline Scale are a good otherwise an enthusiastic compatible device into the North american country sample.
Brand new investigators of the two regions, at the Mexico Town at Hae (standardized) process. New forms have been applied to sets of scientific and you will nursing college students on Mexican and you can Italian language universities. A primary reason trailing new ples of college students connected with medication is actually just the notice you to (one can possibly assume) these types of young people have to have to the medical industry and health conditions, making them so much more tuned in to issues such as for example ED. Informed agree was obtained from all of the studies professionals. All called youngsters offered to participate. The newest particular local stability committees accepted this new non-invasive techniques. Professional translators undertook and regulated new interpretation and you may retranslation of your own tool.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for