Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity caliente Paraguayan mujeres saliendo, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-styears peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weight reduction discipline is actually mentioned by Slimming down Level of the Dinner Thinking Shot (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of 16 statements obtained towards an excellent 6-part measure (never ever = 0/always = 5), with highest scores showing a higher level off controlled eating. Into the Eat psychometrical qualities pick Garner ainsi que al. (1982). This new feel coefficient for both products, the newest Mexican and you may Italian language of these, is of the identical worthy of, a leader out of 0.76.
Weight loss discipline
Ineffectiveness scale. The negative connect with grounds was projected through the Ineffectiveness Level out-of the Dinner Disorders Catalog (EDI) (Gather mais aussi al., 1983), which has illustrated an effective convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self-esteem ) from R = 0.70 (p
Scientific team got the extra weight and you may height methods
Bmi (BMI). Body mass index try calculated since lbs from inside the kilograms split up from the height from inside the square yards (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Before analysis collection, a beneficial pilot examination of the newest Silhouettes Level (Contour step 1), applied to an example consisting of 20 North american country pupils, was used to check the newest appropriateness of one’s data so you’re able to show system versions, in order to corroborate a beneficial acceptation of an unfamiliar band of silhouettes and you can a clear knowledge of the fresh new advice (the fresh new Italian language group already mentioned with research contained in this regard). The results presented new Silhouette Size is actually a great otherwise an enthusiastic compatible means to your Mexican shot.
The brand new investigators of the two regions, during the Mexico Town and at Hae (standardized) process. The fresh new surveys was indeed applied to categories of scientific and medical students within Mexican and Italian language universities. A primary reason about brand new ples out of pupils linked to medication is actually precisely the focus you to (one can possibly assume) such teenagers must have into scientific profession and for health problems, making them more attentive to troubles eg ED. Informed agree is extracted from all of the study people. All the called college students accessible to participate. The brand new particular local integrity committees acknowledged the fresh new non-intrusive techniques. Professional translators undertook and you may controlled the new interpretation and retranslation of your tools.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for